Latest News

Why Trump Doesn’t Have The Power To Mess With National Monuments

WASHINGTON — Nothing imparts U.S. chairmen the authority to abolish, decrease or otherwise weaken national tombstones, four legal scholars have concluded in a brand-new analysis.

However timely and important, the findings are likely to be ignored by President Donald Trump, who appears set on trying to cancel monument status on locates such as the 1.35 million-acre Bears Ears National Monument in Utah, or at least decrease them. If he does, the administration will almost certainly be challenged in court.

In their newspaper, two constitution professors from the University of Colorado and UCLA, an helper constitution professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and a constitution academy companion at UCLA conclude that Congress , not the president, has sole legal power to cancel or cripple shields for tombstones designated by the Antiquities Act of 1906.

Twenty-seven of America’s national tombstones, spanning more than 11 million acres of land and about 760 million hectares of ocean, are threatened by a pair of executive orders signed by Trump last-place month. One ordering duty the Interior Department with reviewing all federal tombstones 100,000 acres or larger that were established or expanded after Jan. 1, 1996. The other informs the Department of Commerce to review all marine sanctuaries and tombstones designated or expanded within the last 10 years.

Sean Hecht, a co-author of the working paper and co-executive director of the Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at UCLA School of Law, told HuffPost the Antiquities Act — signed off by President Theodore Roosevelt more than a century ago — is “unusual” in that, unlike other statutes of that era, it did not grant chairmen the authority to withdraw or repeal shields. The degree of the laws and regulations is to allow for chairmen to set aside regions for preservation — not take out shields put in place by their predecessors.

Furthering their statement, Hecht and the others point to a 1938 sentiment by then-Attorney General Homer Cummings and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, which conclude the laws and regulations does not allows users a president to reverse a monument.

” We’re self-confident that our see of the laws and regulations is remedy ,” Hecht told HuffPost.

Kevin Lamarque/ Reuters
President Donald Trump displays an executive ordering examining previous national tombstone monikers established under the Antiquities Act at a signing ceremony on April 26.

The Antiquities Act permits the chairman to” declare by public proclamation historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric arrangements, and other objects of historic or scientific interest the hell is situated upon the lands owned or controlled by the Government of the United States to be national tombstones .” Sixteen chairmen have applied the laws and regulations to designate 157 tombstones.

No president has ever is seeking to repealed a monument designation.

Trump’s orders call for the pair of federal agencies to” review” recent monikers and offering recommendations. What Trump and Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke have made clear, however, is that “they il be” pushing for much more.

In his statements last-place month , Trump said he’s looking to end” another egregious insult of federal ability ,” put” nations back in charge” and open up now-protected areas to” tremendously positive things .” The constitution, he added,” does not give the federal government limitless ability to lock up millions of acres of land and water, and it’s time we intent this abusive practice .”

Zinke said last month that the law has ” become a tool of political advocacy rather than public interest” and that past administrations have abused it by dismissing its language specifying tombstones be” confined to the smallest area compatible with proper care and handling .”

” Despite this clear directive,’ smallest area’ has too often become certain exceptions rather than the rule ,” Zinke said last month.

In our efforts to attain his degree, Zinke noted that America’s first tombstone, Devils Tower in Wyoming, designated by Roosevelt in 1906, was less than 1,200 acres.” Yet, in recent years, we’ve seen tombstones span hundreds of millions of acres ,” Zinke announced, a clear reference to marine tombstone monikers and expansions by chairmen George W. Bush and Barack Obama.

What Zinke fails to mention is that the size of several early tombstones rival the designations of recent years. In 1908, for example, two years after the Antiquities Act became constitution, Roosevelt — of whom Zinke is an” unapologetic admirer and disciple” — designated more than 800,000 hectares of Grand Canyon as a national tombstone.( Simply a few Obama-era land tombstones are larger .)

Republican chairmen Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover also designated tombstones over thousands and thousands of acres. Coolidge designated Alaska’s Glacier Bay in 1925, and Hoover set aside California’s Death Valley in 1937.

Hecht said he sees what the Trump administration is do — and supposing — as” wholly political .” A look at history, he announced, is clear that chairmen, both Republican and Democrat, have applied the laws and regulations to much the same scope and scale.

Ultimately, Hecht expects the Trump administration will move to abolish or decrease tombstones, which will inevitably lead to a battle in the courts. If that happens, Hecht announced, he would expect national courts to agree with the legal statu he and the others outlined in their newspaper.

” For more than 100 years, Chairpeople from Teddy Roosevelt to Barack Obama have applied the Antiquities Act to safeguard our historical, scientific, and cultural heritage, often at the very minute when these resources were at risk of being exploited ,” the authors write.” That is the enduring bequest of this extraordinary constitution. And it remains our best hope for saving our public land resources well into the future .”

The paper has been accepted for publishing by Virginia Law Review Online.

As part of its review, the Interior Department kicked off a public remark period last week. Commentaries relating to Bears Ears are due by May 26, while remarks related to all other tombstones must be submitted by July 10. As of Thursday, more than 45,000 remarks had been submitted.

Read the full research paper here.

Read more: http :// /~ ATAGEND

Most Popular

To Top