Politics

What if nature, like firms, had the rights of a person? | Chip Colwell

For some people like, the Zuni in New Mexico, wild places are considered living beings. In western society, its companies that assume that privileged position

In recent years, the US supreme court has solidified the concept of corporate personhood. Following rulings in such cases as Hobby Lobby and Citizens United, US law has established that companies are, like people, entitled to certain rights and protections.

But thats not the only instance of widening legal rights to nonhuman entities. New Zealand took a radically different approach in 2014 with the Te Urewera Act which granted an 821 -square-mile forest the legal status of a person. The woodland is sacred to the Thoe people, an indigenous group of the Maori. For them Te Urewera is an ancient and ancestral homeland that inhales life into their culture. The woodland is also a living ancestor. The Te Urewera Act concludes that Te Urewera has an identity in and of itself and thus must be its own entity with all the rights, powers, responsibilities, and liabilities of a legal person. Te Urewera holds title to itself.

Although this legal approach is unique to New Zealand, the underlying reason for it is not. Over the last 15 years I have documented similar culture expressions by Native Americans about their traditional, sacred places. As an anthropologist, this research has often pushed me to search for an answer to the profound question: What does it mean for nature to be a person?

A majestic mountain sits not far north-west of Albuquerque, New Mexico. Like a low triangle, with long gentle slopes, Mount Taylor is clothed in rich woods that appear a velvety charcoal-blue from the distance. Its bald summit, more than 11,000 feet high, is often blanketed in snowfall a reminder of the bles of water, when seen from the blaze desert below.

The Zuni tribe lives about 40 miles west of Mount Taylor. In 2012, I worked with a team to interview 24 tribal members about the values they hold for Dewankwin Kyaba: chu Yalanne( In the East Snow-capped Mountain ), as Mount Taylor is called in the Zuni language. We were told that their most ancient ancestors began an epic migration in the Grand Canyon.

Over millennia they migrated across the south-west, with important medicine societies and clans living around Mount Taylor. After settling in their current pueblo homes, Zunis returned to this sacred mountain to hunt animals like deer and bear, harvest wild plants like acorns and cattails, and meet minerals used in sacrosanct rituals that keep the universe in order. Across the generations Dewankwin Kyaba: chu Yalanne has come to shape Zuni history, life and identity no less than the Vatican has for Catholics.

But unlike holy places in the western world, Zunis believe Mount Taylor is a living being. Zuni elders told me that the mountain was created within the Earths womb. As a mountain formed by volcanic activity, it has always grown and aged. The mountain can give life as people do. The mountains snow melts in springtime and nourishes plants and wildlife for miles. Water is the mountains blood; interred minerals are the mountains meat. Because it lives, deep below is its beating heart. Zunis consider Mount Taylor to be their kin.

There is a stereotype that Native American people have a singular connection to nature. And yet in my experience, they do assure the world in a fundamentally different way from most people I know. Whether it is mountains, rivers, rocks, animals, plants, stars or weather, they assure the natural world as living and breathing, profoundly relational, even at times all-knowing and transcendent.

In my work with Arizonas Hopi tribe, I have traveled with culture leaders to analyzed sacred places. They often stop to listen to the wind, or search the sky for an eagle, or smile when it begins to rainfall, which they believe is a blessing the ancestors bestow upon them.

During one project with the Hopi tribe, we went across a rattlesnake coiled near an ancient fallen pueblo. Long ago, one of them ancestors lived here and turned into a rattlesnake, the elder Raleigh H Puhuyaoma Sr shared with me, pointing to the nearby archaeological site. Its now protecting the place. The elders left an offering of cornmeal to the snake. An elder afterward told me that it soon rained on his cornfield, a result from this spiritual exchange.

Understanding these culture worldviews matters greatly in discussions over protecting places in nature. The American west has a long history of battles over the control of land. Weve seen this recently from the Bundy familys takeover of the federal wildlife refuge in Oregon to the current fight over turning Bears Ears 1.9 million acres of wilderness into their own nationals monument in Utah.

Yet often these combats are less about the fight between private and public interests, and more about basic questions of natures purpose. Do wild places have intrinsic worth? Or is the land a mere tool for human uses?

Much of my research has involved documenting sacred places because they are being threatened by development projects on public land. The Zunis sacred Mount Taylor, much of it managed by the US National Forest Service, has been extensively mined for uranium, and is the cause of violent disputes over whether it should be developed or protected.

Even though the US does not legally acknowledge natural places as people, some legal protections exist for sacred places. Under the National Historic Preservation Act, for example, the US government must take into consideration the potential impacts of certain development projects on traditional culture properties.

This and other federal heritage laws, however, provide tribes with a small voice in the process, little power, and rarely lead to preservation. More to the point, these laws reduce what tribes see as living places to properties, obscuring their inherent spiritual value.

In New Zealand, the Te Urewera Act offers a higher level of protection, empowering a board to be the lands guardian. The Te Urewera Act, though, does not remove its connection to humans. With work permits, people can hunting, fish, farm and more. The public still has access to the forest. One segment of the law even allows Te Urewera to be mined.

Te Urewera told us that recognise culture opinions of places as living does not mean objective the relationship between humans and nature, but reordering it recognise natures intrinsic worth and respecting indigenous philosophies.

In the US and elsewhere, I believe we can do better to align our legal system with the culture expressions of the people it serves. For instance, Congress could amend the NHPA or the American Indian Religious Freedom Act to acknowledge the deep culture connection between tribes and natural places, and afford better protections for sacred landscapes like New Mexicos Mount Taylor.

Until then, it says much about us when companies are considered people before nature is.

This article originally appeared on The Conversation

Read more: www.theguardian.com

Related Post

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular

To Top