Progressives Actually Like Democrats’ New Message

WASHINGTON — Leading progressives commended the new message unveiled by top earners Democrats Monday that emphasizes economic policy, indicating that the party is moving from the internecine finger-pointing which has dogged it since November’s election.

Under the slogan “A Better Deal: Better Jobs, Better Wages, Better Future,”House and Senate Democratic leaders laid out a three-pronged platform together with ideas for making decent-paying jobs; reducing family costs, chief among them prescriptions medication; and enhancing access to the education and training Americans need to compete in the job market.

The proposals reflect the party’s first major effort to recalibrate its fundamental themes ahead of the 2018 midterm elections and then restore its historical reputation as the celebration of regular working people after RepublicanDonald Trump‘s surprise victory at 2016s presidential race. At a representational bid to highlight their desire to achieve a wider swath of all Americans, party leaders declared that the new agenda in Berryville, Virginia — some 65 miles from the halls of power in Washington.

Prominent liberals, who’ve been nudging the celebration in this direction for years, largely welcomed the past effort.

“This really is a really refreshing message it does not seem like poll-tested messaging. It seems true and passionate and daring,” said Tamara Draut, vice president for research and policy at Demos, a radical think tank and advocacy group.

“A ‘Better Deal,’ and more importantly, what [Senate Minority Leader] Chuck Schumer and [House Minority Leader] Nancy Pelosi are saying about their new focus, is exceptionally strong,” said Alex Lawson, executive director of Social Security Works, a nonprofit fighting to expand Social Security and Medicare. “It’s not perfect, it’s not just what the grassroots is demanding. However, as a starting point it is very, very strong.”

Each Of Us , a pressure group which has threatened to help difficulties in primaries against Democratic lawmakers deemed exceptionally progressive, combined praise with demands for increased action.

The group termed the agenda “a step toward embracing progressive populism” which “does not go far enough”

The plan from the top Democrats “is still unclear about where the party stands on tackling climate change, health care, increasing racism, and free high education, and if they’re willing to force the billionaire course to finally pay their fair share,” Each Of Us said in a statement

Nina Turner, president of our Revolution, a team formed to continue the legacy of the Sen. Bernie Sanders‘ presidential effort, also noted that the omission of climate change and racial justice coverages, as well as a strategy to give free college instruction. She credited the party for admitting significant deficiencies, but said the actual evidence would be in attempts to follow through to the program’s lofty objectives.

“I expect this isn’t only a cute way to try and appease people by forming another poll. We don’t need a committee — we still need a commitment to actual policy changes,” she said.

A Senate Democratic aide who requested anonymity to remark said the new message was concentrated exclusively on economic policy, that did not signify any less of a commitment to combatting climate change, fighting racial justice and other matters.

Tom Williams/Getty Images
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) , left, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), along with other Democrats arrive to introduce “A Better Deal” at Berryville, Virginia.  

Despite all the criticism, the answer is a far cry from the mockery elicited by a previous, leaked draft of the Democratic slogan a week: “A Better Deal: Better Skills, Better Jobs, Better Wages.”

The term’s similarity to the tagline of ads forPapa John’s pizza chain and dominant positioning of “Better Skills” — an apparent nod to some much-maligned financial conceptthat blames joblessness on a dearth of skilled employees — drew scorn from most corners of the political world.

The details of the proposition and removal of the offending “Better Skills” clause quieted a lot of the criticism.

“Absolutely, we have to help people get the skills they want,” said Draut. “However, it isn’t the very first thing we need to perform and it is certainly not the first thing people want to hear. Even individuals with the right skills are having difficulty getting ahead.”

A senior aide to a House Democrat imputed Schumer’s political instincts for the party’s populist pivot.

“Chuck Schumer knows how the wind is not blowing. Can’t say that for other members of leadership,” said the aide, who requested anonymity to remark.

“A Better Deal” joins a few well known, albeit recent additions to the Democratic canon — a nationwide $15 minimum commission; a $1 trillion infrastructure package; 12 months of paid family leave; protecting Social Security and Medicare — together with new ideas, such as a small-business tax charge for job training and apprenticeship programs. These proposals are most likely to find favor with all the party’s pro-business wing.

In presenting ways to reduce households’ costs of living, yet, Schumer, Pelosi and their deputies embraced an anti-monopoly, economic populism that bears little resemblance to the centrist triangulation of former President Bill Clinton, or even the free-trade-friendly technocracy of former President Barack Obama.

“You have seen a change away from the centrist politics and policies of the Democratic Party toward daring ideas that fulfill the challenges facing working people now,” Draut said. “This is a development under way for a while now that has solidified.”

Especially, Democrats want to enable the Medicare programto negotiate lower drug prices with pharmaceutical companies, make a new national agency to investigate and apply action against prescription medication “price gouging,” and demand that drug businesses explain significant price increases.

The celebration can be taking on the issue of corporate consolidation, promising tougher antitrust rules directed at curbing mega-mergers and using a national watchdog — a “21st century trust buster” — apply regulations even after a merger occurs.

The growing size and reach a couple of corporations from banks to airlines to technology giants like Amazon, Google and Facebook — has been a topic of growing interest among progressive intellectuals who blame new monopoly power for issues ranging from the 2008 monetary crisis to wage stagnation and the decline of rural America.

Top proponents of daring antitrust action,that elected Democrats have sometimes been more economical to get apart from coverage professionals, were enthused about the new platform and the rhetoric used to promote it.

The Democratic leaders promised to follow along with additional proposals geared toward making child care more affordable; cracking down on foreign exchange abuses; guaranteeing high-speed internet access; and enhancing retirement security.

Signs have emerged that the party is keen to emulate the fiery tone and also financial strain of Sanders, one of a small number of elected officials that can pack arenas within short notice and, even based on one poll, the nation’s most popular politician. At an Sunday New York Times op-ed previewing the new agenda, Schumer echoed Sanders’ populist themes, promising a “better bargain so that this country works for everybody again, not only the elites and special interests”

“Democrats have too frequently hesitated from taking on … misguided policies right and unflinchingly — so much so that many Americans don’t know what we stand for,” he also wrote.

Sanders, a member of Senate Democratic leadership despite maintaining his own voter registration as a separate, was one of individuals plugging “A Better Deal” at a 3-minute promotional movie accompanying the rollout at Berryville.

Needless to say, the celebration has not embraced all these Vermont senator’s policy preferences — steering clear of single-payer health insurance and free school tuition programs which have been the cornerstones of his presidential campaign.

The choice not to stick to the slate of proposals preferred by the remaining won the approval of a Democratic moderates.

“There’s something in there for all spheres of the party,” said Ladan Ahmadi, a spokeswoman for Third Way, a centrist Democratic think tank. ”

Ahmadi cited the inclusion of job training tax credits as a example of the kind of policies more adapting to the likes of Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) , a financial conservative.

Nevertheless at a Sunday appearance on ABC’s “This Week” Schumer went farther than either he or Pelosi have ever gone toward endorsing government-run wellness insurance i.e., a single-payer system. That notion is gaining traction with all the Affordable Care Act, a public-private patchwork, on the chopping block.

Predicting that Republicans would neglect to detain Obamacare and that the two parties would then come together to stabilize the marketplaces generated by the law, ” Schumer said, “we are likely to consider wider matters — single individual is one of them”

Other choices “on the table,” he added, include reducing Medicare’s age qualification to 55 and enabling users to purchase into Medicare or Medicaid.

Those weary of the party’s efforts to pin blame for Trump’s election on the interference of either the Russian authorities or prior FBI director James Comey expressed relief that Schumer was prepared to have a hard look at the mirror.

“It’s about time! It just took them approximately 8 weeks to realize that the Russia narrative ai not functioning,” said Turner, who’s also a former Ohio state senator.

In the wake of the election, the Democrats have been plagued by feuds between warring factions of the party with rival explanations for recent electoral failures.

The arguments over the party’s message and focus stay real, but the mostly positive responses to “A Better Deal” suggest a fragile detente has taken attention.

“I’m not interested in the past,” said Lawson, who backed Sanders overHillary Clinton from the Democrats’ 2016 presidential main race. “I’m considering moving ahead and winning and carrying on the billionaire course and putting in place policies which function for the American individuals. How that you do it is making clear whose side you are on.”

Read more:

Most Popular

To Top