The City Council of a Maryland beach community comprised a special session Saturday to extended an” emergency regulation” explicitly barring females from removing their crests at the beach — or in any other public place.
Ocean City Mayor Richard Meehan called the meeting to ” shield ” family privileges after the local coast patrol chose they are able to no longer order topless wives to cover up. That decision was made after local” top free” activist Chelsea Covington complained to officials last-place summer that the commonwealth constitution prohibits gender discrimination, which she argued would make laws ordering merely females to wear tops illegal.
Worcester County State’s Attorney Beau Oglesby “ve decided that” the law on indecent exposure was unclearand asked for a final ruling from the Maryland attorney general’s office, which is still pending. Until an sentiment is issued, the beach patrol did not believe it could taking any decision against topless women as it had in the past, mentioned Ocean City Beach Patrol Captain Butch Arbin.
That’s when Meehan is entered into overdirve.” Ocean City is a family resort and we intend to do whatever is within our capacity to likewise protect the rights of those households ,” he declared.
The city’s new emergency regulation amends the cities code relating nudity. While continuing to prohibit exposure of male and female genitalia, it also clearly declares that it is illegal to disclose” the female breast with less than a amply opaque extending” on the beach and in any public field. Anyone who does so will be issued as part of a fine of up to $1,000.
The ordinance, read during the videotaped conference Saturday, is to say that” there is no constitutional privilege for an individual to show … in a state of nudity .”
It adds:” Whatever personal right one has to be nude or in a state of nudity, that right becomes subject to government concern and the rules of procedure when one is making an effort to exert it in public .”
The ordinance was extended unanimously and took effect immediately.
Meehan declared at the end of the session:” We will not allow girls to be topless on our beach or on any public property within the city limits. We have never been a topless beach and we will not become a topless beach .”
A town spokeswoman said the law won’t alter breastfeeding.
At the start of the session, City Solicitor Guy Ayres read the ordinance, which included a listing of reasonswhy the law is legal and why it does not violate constitutional shields against discrimination.
” Equal shield” does not requirement” that things that are different in fact be treated the same in constitution , nor that both governments feign “there wasnt” physiological differences between men and women ,” Ayres read..
He added:” People don’t have the right to impose their lifestyle on others who have an equal right to be left alone. Ayres also said that” girls baring their breasts in public, although not offensive to everyone, is still verified by civilization as unpalatable .”